Advocates of Open Government Data[1] (OGD) talk
about the potential of such data to increase government transparency, catalyse
economic growth, address social and environmental challenges and boost
democratic participation. This heady mix of potential benefits has proved
persuasive to the UK Government (and governments around the world). Over the
past decade, since the emergence of the OGD agenda, the UK Government has
invested extensively in making more of its data open. Yet the transformative
impacts claimed by OGD advocates still seem a rather distant possibility. Even
the more modest goal of integrating the creation and use of OGD into the
mainstream practices of government, businesses and citizens remains to be
achieved. In this blog I reflect upon the barriers preventing the OGD agenda from
making a breakthrough into the mainstream. These reflections centre on the five
key finds of my research,
recently published in Policy and Internet, exploring where members of the UK
OGD community perceive barriers to the OGD agenda.
1. Barriers to the
OGD agenda are perceived to be widespread
Unsurprisingly, given the relatively limited
impact of OGD to date, my research shows that barriers to the OGD agenda are
perceived to be widespread and numerous. What I find rather more surprising is
the expectation, amongst policy makers, that these barriers should just melt
away when exposed to the OGD agenda’s transparently obvious value and
virtue. Rather given that the
breakthrough of the OGD agenda requires change across the complex
socio-technical structures of government and society, many teething problems
should be expected and considerable work will be required to overcome them.
2. Barriers on
the demand side are of great concern
Members of the UK OGD community are particularly concerned
about the wide range of demand side barriers, including the low level of demand
for OGD across civil society and the public and private sectors. These concerns
are likely to have arisen as a legacy of the OGD community’s focus on the supply
of OGD, which has often led the community to overlook the need to nurture
initiatives and groups that make use of OGD.
Adopting a strategic approach to supporting
niches of OGD use could help overcome some of the demand side barriers. For
example, such an approach could foster the social learning required to overcome
barriers relating to the practices and business models of data users. Whilst
there are encouraging signs that the Open Data Institute is supporting OGD use
in the private sector, there remains a significant opportunity to improve the
support offered to potential OGD users across civil society. It is also important to recognise that increasing
the support for OGD users is not guaranteed to result in increased demand.
Rather the possibility remains that demand for OGD is limited for many other reasons
– including the possibility that the majority of businesses, citizens and
community organisations find OGD of very little value.
3. The structures
of government continue to act as barriers
Members of the UK OGD community are also
concerned that major barriers remain on the supply side particularly in the
form of the established structures and institutions of government. For example,
barriers were perceived in the forms of the risk adverse cultures of government
organisations and the ad hoc funding of OGD initiatives. Although resilient
these structures are dynamic, so proponents of OGD need to be aware of emerging
‘windows of opportunity’ as they open up. Such opportunities may take the form
of: tensions within the structures of government (e.g. restrictions on data
sharing between different parts of government present an opportunity for OGD to
create efficiency savings); and external pressures on government (e.g. the
pressures exerted by a rapidly changing climate could create opportunities for
OGD initiatives and demand for OGD).
4. There are major
challenges mobilising resources to support the open government data agenda
The research results also showed that members of
UK OGD community see mobilising the resources required to support the OGD as a
major challenge. Concerns around securing funding are predictably prominent,
but concerns also extend to developing the skills and knowledge required to use
OGD across civil society, government and the private sector. These challenges
are likely to persist whilst the post-financial crisis narrative of public
deficit reduction through public spending reduction dominates the political
agenda. This leaves OGD advocates to consider the politics and ethics of
calling for investment in OGD initiatives whilst elsewhere spending reductions
are leading to the degradation of public services provision to vulnerable and
socially excluded individuals.
5. Within the OGD
community the nature of some barriers remains contentious
OGD is often presented by advocates as a neutral,
apolitical public good. However, my research highlights the important role that
values and politics plays in how individuals within the OGD community perceive
the agenda and the barriers it faces.
For example, there are considerable differences in opinion, within the
OGD community, on whether or not a private sector focus on exploiting financial
value from OGD is crowding out the creation of social and environmental
value. So benefits may arise from
advocates being more open about the values and politics that underpin and shape
the agenda. Whilst, OGD related policy and practice could create further
opportunities for social learning which bring together the diverse values and perspectives
that coexist within the OGD community.
Having considered the wide range of barriers to
the breakthrough of OGD agenda, and some approaches to overcoming these
barriers, these discussions need setting in a broader political context. If the
agenda does indeed make a breakthrough into the mainstream, it remains unclear
what form this will take. Will the OGD agenda make a breakthrough by conforming
with, and reinforcing, prevailing neoliberal interests? Or will the agenda
stretch the fabric of government, the economy and society, and transform the
relationship between citizens and the state?
If you are
interested you are interested in reading more about the research underpinning
this blog the published paper can be found here http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1944-2866.POI367/abstract or
do drop me an email requesting a copy (chris.martin@open.ac.uk).
[1]The Open Knowledge Foundation define Open
Government Data as: data produced or commissioned by government or government
controlled entities that can be freely used, reused and redistributed by anyone.
Finding it rather ironic that - even as an OU staff member - the library does not appear to have a subscription to this journal...?
ReplyDeleteI know it's frustrating - hence the suggestion at the end of the blog to drop me an email and then I can pass on a copy of the paper.
ReplyDelete